Review Quality Criteria

Reviewers were instructed to assess the quality of submissions solely based on the academic merit of their content along the following dimensions.

  1. Pertinence of the article’s content to the scope and themes of the conference;
  2. Clear demonstration of originality, novelty, and timeliness of the research;
  3. Soundness of the methods, analyses, and results;
  4. Adherence to the ethical standards and codes of conduct relevant to the research field;
  5. Clarity, cohesion, and accuracy in language and other modes of expression, including figures and tables.
    In addition, all of the articles have been checked for textual overlap in an effort to detect possible signs of plagiarism by the publisher.

In addition, all of the articles have been checked for textual overlap in an effort to detect possible signs of plagiarism by the publisher.